Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Odradek. Studies in Philosophy of Literature, Aesthetics, and New Media Theories
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Search
  • Register
  • Login
  1. Home /
  2. Archives

  • Heretical voices: the reasons of the essay in modern and contemporary literature
    Vol 8 No 2 (2022)
    One of the features that anyone embarking on the description of the essay as a genre unquestionably has to face is the indeterminacy that is germane to its essence (Obaldia 1995), which is reflected in a desultory and fragmentary style, made up of anecdotes, illuminations, criticisms and suggestions for further reflection (Berardinelli 2008). Ever since its 17th-century origins, the essay has represented a site where it is possible to engage in vehement public oration – often simply unrequired or explicitly opposed – in the manner of the famous “soapbox orators” in Hyde Park (Sanders 1989).  Following T. W. Adorno’s 1958 definition of the essay as a “heretical genre”, we might indeed be tempted to postulate that the essayist’s voice is bestowed on his/her readers at full strength when it engages in a process of systemic critique and current demystifying of dogmas pertaining either to a specific intellectual paradigm or to a historical period at large. Embodied from time to time by medieval Scholasticism, or 18th-century Enlightenment, Victorian moralism, up to 20th-century Totalitarian ideologies, these dogmas sanctioned, by means of their inflexibility, the victory of single memorable essays that have remained, despite their original context of production, aesthetical testimonies capable of resisting the decay of the material situation they originally commented upon (Ozick 1997).  A fierce, free, heretical voice is what allows the essayist to embark on a diffused, polemical questioning of the received doxa, of the conventional idée reçue, of ideological conformity, and it also allows a retrospective recognition of the essay as the prime literary form suitable for criticism, intended as a campaign against banality deriving its strength from an epideictic liveliness embodied by the logic of the vox clamantis in deserto.
  • Creativity in the Light of AI
    Vol 8 No 1 (2022)
  • Patterns of Attention
    Vol 7 No 2 (2021)
  • Love Matters, Hegelian Patterns. A Symposium on Paul Kottman's "Love as Human Freedom"
    Vol 7 No 1 (2021)
  • Self-Deception in Literature
    Vol 6 No 2 (2020)
  • Aesthetics and Politics in Wilhelm von Humboldt
    Vol 6 No 1 (2020)
  • The Philosophical Readings of Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Writers
    Vol 5 No 2 (2019)
  • Estetica dal mondo
    Vol 5 No 1 (2019)
  • Miscellanea I
    Vol 4 No 2 (2018)
  • Melancholy
    Vol 4 No 1 (2018)
  • Remediation: art, technology and humanity
    Vol 3 No 1-2 (2017)
    A medium is an extension of ourselves that allowing us to improve the relationship we entertain with our body. Remediation consists of the representation of one medium in another. It is the key feature of the new media.  
  • Denkbilder. «Thought-Images» in 20th-Century German Prose
    Vol 2 No 2 (2016)
  • "Like a novel": Crossing Perspectives between Knowing, Story and Digression
    Vol 2 No 1 (2016)
  • The Quarrel between Poetry and Philosophy
    Vol 1 No 2 (2015)
  • Aesthetics in the Age of New Media
    Vol 1 No 1 (2015)
Open Journal Systems
Subscription

Login to access subscriber-only resources.

Language
  • Deutsch
  • Español (España)
  • Français (Canada)
  • Italiano
  • Português (Portugal)
  • English
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

ODRADEK. Studies in Philosophy of Literature, Aesthetics, and New Media Theories. ISSN 2465-1060 [online]

 

Edited by the University of Pisa 

License Creative Commons

Odradek. Studies in Philosophy of Literature, Aesthetics and New Media Theories is licensed under a Creative Commons attribution, non-commercial 4.0 International.

Further authorization out of this license terms may be available at http://zetesisproject.com or writing to: zetesis@unipi.it.

About this Publishing System